Yesterday's post defending free speech against Islamist terrorists received a puzzling, anonymous comment:
disingenous rhetoric is no less disingenuous accompanied by a veneer of (in no way unjustified) indignationThis comment was accompanied by an unlinked link - maybe too much trouble for the anonymous individual? I decided to help the person out:
Here's your link, properly linked.No response so far. But perhaps the implication was not about de Boer. Maybe the anonymous statement was directed at me.
And here's your statement, properly written: "Disingenuous rhetoric is no less disingenuous accompanied by a veneer of (in no way unjustified) indignation."
Perhaps you could unpack that for readers here. Are you implying that Fredrik de Boer is disingenuous?
If anonymous meant that I am the disingenuous one, then that's hardly the way to initiate a discussion - starting off with an ad hominem attack calling me a liar.
Such a conversation as that never makes any real progress, and if that's the game, I refuse to be drawn in.