Thursday, May 10, 2007

The fewtrility of time spent in Hell...

homo homini lupus
Canis lupus or Cainus lupus?
(Image from Wikipedia)

Deogolwulf was recently reimbursed with the wages of sin and spent his paycheck on a lost weekend harrowing some drunkards' Hell.

Hell lost, and Deogolwulf liberated 17 captive fewtrils from the abyss, offering them as gifts to the elect readers of his blog. Here's my favorite, Fewtril #186:
"A contrarian is easily led astray; one need only point him in the right direction."
Well said! Not that I agree with this, of course. Indeed, I strongly doubt it. I can't quite put my finger on why, but it just seems wrong. Totally wrong.

And how I wish that Fewtril #187 were also wrong:
"It is in poor taste to say that a man is made happy once he has been disabused of the guards of his happiness -- his illusions. One disabuses a man of his illusions because one wants him to see the world as it is, or as one sees it. The last thing one has in mind is his happiness."
"Sigh..." I never realized this. All those years disabusing the misled of their illusions, thinking that I was contributing to their happiness. To think ... that I was the one so misled. Ah, misery.... Whatever can I do with my life now?

Then, there's the occasional stumper like Fewtril #193:
"One may easily get another to admit his shortcomings provided he has hasn't already bragged of them."
Uh ... "has hasn't"? What's Deogolwulf getting at? A semi-Hegelian negotiation of the negation? Or the beginnings of an unprofound thought of the sort intimated by Deogolwulf in his musings on the creative process, found in Fewtril #191:
"One will occasionally have inexpressibly profound feelings about something -- one feels one knows the hidden truth about it, but cannot quite grasp it. This may well be the beginnings of a profound thought, but then again it may not, and one ought not to flatter oneself into believing that it is."
Setting that Möbius musing to one side ... or the other (it's all the same), let me end, finally, with the rude truth of Fewtril #198:
"We can hardly imagine what fools we look to posterity, and in what present and prepossessing absurdities we engage, until we catch a glimpse of ourselves in the mirror of history."
In my case, I need merely gaze into the mirror of my personal history...

Labels:

6 Comments:

At 7:02 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

OFF-TOPIC POST

I scrolled down the menu twice and was unable to locate an email, so I'm posting a link here that might be of interest to you:

http://www.maltastar.com/pages/msfullart.asp?an=11970

"Pope warns: If you’re pro-abortion you’ll be excommunicated "

"During a media interview aboard the papal plane on it's way to Brazil, Pope Benedict warned Catholic politicians that they face being excommunicated if they support abortion. "

You can read the entire story by clicking on the link.

If you blog it, they will comment. (I can't quote literature, but I can twist movie lines.)

 
At 7:57 AM, Blogger Horace Jeffery Hodges said...

And here I thought that the Pope was heading for Brazil to stanch the loss of Catholics from the Church.

Thanks for the alert. I'll read the report but probably avoid blogging on it. Abortion is a topic that generates far more heat than light.

Jeffery Hodges

* * *

 
At 9:48 AM, Blogger Kate Marie said...

Thanks for the heads up on all those fewtrils. Glad to be one of the elect!

It's probably wise not to comment on the Pope. Isn't he a reader of this blog, after all?

 
At 4:32 PM, Blogger Horace Jeffery Hodges said...

You're welcome, KM. The fewtrils are not few this time but, rather, many -- even many thrills.

Jeffery Hodges

* * *

 
At 8:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see this more as a conflict between the teachings and practice of a religion and the separation of church and state rather than an abortion issue per se. The article (or maybe another one) also mentioned Catholic politicians voting on laws regarding same-sex marriages.

All politicians, indeed all people, are guided by their religious faith, but in secular nations with a religious plurality, it's not something to be talked about publicly.

In any case, I respect your decision to avoid an issue that's not a good fit with your blog.

 
At 9:13 PM, Blogger Horace Jeffery Hodges said...

Sonagi, thanks for being understanding.

Some issues are very difficult to deal with because they invite dilemmas between which I have little of substance to add despite the importance of those issues.

On such issues, I often have views, but too often views that I can't easily, coherently explain.

So, I choose silence.

Jeffery Hodges

* * *

 

Post a Comment

<< Home