The Imperfect Sentence in Rhythmic Paragraphs
Writing about writing in a blog entry titled "The Perfect Sentence," novelist Olen Steinhauer observes:
"You can think of it this way: in poetry, one worries about the individual word. In shorts, about the sentence. Then in novels it becomes the paragraph."
By the expression "In shorts," Olen's not referring to some odd predilection for writing while clad only in his underwear but to the literary 'fact' that writers composing short stories concentrate on the sentence.
Though we'd doubtless find exceptions to Olen's observation, he speaks of what he knows. From his own experience as a writer, Olen explains:
"[S]ome time ago I stopped worshipping the sentence as a perfect, self-contained structure. At some point it was no longer important to get my whole meaning out before the full-stop. I also decided that it wasn't important to get the meaning, or resonance, of a story into its opening sentence, because novels (unlike, say, short stories) have another hundred thousand words following that opening, and one of the most important things is to get the rhythm right."
Two points may still need some clarification. On the one hand, Olen suggests that the sentence is less important in a novel than in a short story simply because a novel is longer. On the other hand, he implies that the more significant reason for the difference lies in the novel's rhythm.
I think that he means the rhythm of a novel's paragraphs:
"I've stopped thinking of sentences as packages of complete thought. For me, paragraphs are a more useful tool for explicating a concept, thought or idea."
The length the novel and the rhythm of its paragraphs are not unrelated, of course, but they're potentially separable. If length alone were the causal factor and rhythm a function of length, then we might expect to find a similar difference between lyric and epic poetry. Maybe we do, to some extent, but anyone who has attempted to read Paradise Lost, for example, has experienced firsthand Milton's attention to words despite the length of his poem.
Perhaps if Milton had written in stanzas, he'd have paid less attention to words and more attention to the larger units -- or if he'd written in rhymed verse, he'd have composed with the rhyme scheme guiding his poetic construction. Possibly the blank verse that he chose allowed him more "ancient liberty" to focus on precisely the exact word that he wanted at each point in his poem.
As the Logos himself said, albeit making a somewhat different point: "gracious was that word which clos'd / Thy sovran sentence" (Paradise Lost 3.144-145).
See? The second person of the Godhead has spoken. It's the word, not the sentence.
4 Comments:
No pressure to write well in an entry entitled "The Perfect Sentence," is there?
I'd venture to add the word flow alongside rhythm. And, of course, voice has to fit in there somewhere--how else do you explain the pace of the commentary in Pale Fire, for example?
Hi Jeffery,
I'm afraid I no longer have your email address (I had to replace my hard drive a while ago), but I wanted to ask what you thought of this piece on plagiarism over at The Wanderer's blog. I know it's a subject close to your heart!
Nathan, you can find my email address by Googling my full name and "Milton List."
As for the Wanderer's plagiarism entry, it confirms what I've been reading -- my students' reluctance to write their own imperfect sentences stems from the indulgence of teachers who themselves have plagiarized.
But let's keep in mind that many Korean scholars are working honestly and doing their own research and writing. Unfortunately, their honest work suffers a blackened reputation by association.
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
Jessica, you might want to visit Olen's blog post and ask him about these other aspects of good writing. He's quite open and engaging -- though he sometimes doesn't reply for a few days when he's busy writing on a novel.
For myself, I think that there are a lot of things that go into good writing. Olen, I believe, was focusing upon differences among categories of writing.
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
Post a Comment
<< Home